Text Box: achievement. Yet it can provide a realistic and practical means to empower a school to have a single, clear, focused action plan or “meaningful road map.” What is even more exciting is that accreditation is not a “hyperventilation every six years”; rather it is an ongoing process. After the full visit has occurred, the school revises its single schoolwide action plan for student achievement by incorporating additional critical areas for follow-up suggested by the visiting committee. The school then implements its plan. Annually the school evaluates   action plan progress and refines the plan based on evidence, including  analyzed   student achievement data as the student/community profile is annually upText Box: dated. The subsequent self-study will be a review of the compilation of all the school’s progress in relation to its        identified areas for improvement and an assessment of its   current program in    relation to the WASC criteria.

As noted above, the accreditation process is unique but directly correlated to what really makes successful schools. Yet  there still is  a need to continually refine the WASC process so that it is indeed the “mantra” for a school’s operation. The Commission looks forward to working with educators knowledgeable in the area of  alternative education to ensure that this powerful school improvement process    addresses the students’ needs. 
Text Box: WASC: A Valuable Improvement Tool
Text Box: Page #
Text Box: “Together, we represent almost one million students. That  gives  us a lot more power.”
 
Text Box:     Volume 17,  Issue 4
Text Box: “This is the most exciting thing I’ve seen in Educational Options.”

In attendance were representatives from CCEA, CCIS (California Consortium of Independent Study), CDS Network (Community Day School Network), JCCASAC (Juvenile Court and        Community Schools), Charter Schools, California Youth Authority, Corrections Education, Cal-Safe, Opportunity Education, Adult Education, and ACSA     Continuation and Educational Options Committee. Additionally, there were  representatives from the California Department of Education, members of Birdsall, Wasco and Associates (lobbyists for CCEA and CCIS). Presenters at the meeting included Bernice Stafford, Senior Vice President of Lightspan, Inc., Marilyn George, Associate Executive Director for WASC, Joy Lewis,   Policy Associate for WestEd, Peter Birdsall and Theresa Inslee of  Birdsall, Wasco and Associates. The group will meet next in October. For more information contact Janet Knoeppel at JanetWK@aol.com.
Text Box: The Educational Options Coordinating Council is a group made up of the leadership from all the major players in         alternative education.  Since January of this year, the organization has been    meeting every two months to discuss    issues of mutual concern. These meetings culminated in a one day summit in     Sacramento on  August 18. This meeting focused on forming a mission and vision statement, refining the Council’s goals, and learning more about marketing our schools and programs.

The primary purpose of the Council is to become an umbrella that can speak with a single, strong voice in Sacramento to the media, to our colleagues and to the public. “This was an outstanding opportunity for us to really understand how much we can accomplish together,” said Janet Knoeppel, president of CCEA. “Each of these organizations alone represents from 3,000 to 100,000 students.  Together, though, we represent almost a million students. There is power in numbers!” Dennis Fisher with the CDE agrees. Text Box: Educational Options Council: Power in Numbers

[ CCEA Home | Newsletters Home | This Newsletter Page:  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 ]

[ CCEA Home | Newsletters Home | This Newsletter Page:  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 ]